Design of Effluent Treatment Plant

A basic effluent treatment plant (ETP) is designed by characterizing the wastewater, setting discharge/reuse targets, selecting a suitable treatment train, and sizing each unit for the design flow and contaminant loads, with dedicated sludge handling and robust monitoring/control. Below is a concise, step-by-step framework with practical sizing rules you can apply to most industrial effluents.

Core design workflow

  • Define influent quality and variability: pH, BOD, COD, TSS, oils/grease, nutrients, metals, color, toxicity.

  • Set effluent standards: discharge permit or reuse specs for BOD, COD, TSS, O&G, TN/TP, pathogens, metals.

  • Determine hydraulics: average/peak flow, diurnal peaks, storm/cleanup events, future expansion.

  • Select process train: pretreatment, primary, secondary (biological), tertiary polishing, disinfection, sludge line.

  • Size equipment and tanks: use conservative loadings, include redundancy, and allow for bypass and isolation.

  • Plan layout and utilities: gravity flow where possible, safe access, ventilation/odor control, chemical storage.

  • Specify instrumentation/automation: online sensors, PLC/SCADA, alarms, interlocks, remote access.

  • Validate and optimize: jar tests, pilot trials, life-cycle cost, O&M plan, spares, operator training.

Typical process train

  • Preliminary: coarse/fine screening, grit removal, equalization, pH/alkalinity control, oil-water separation.

  • Primary: coagulation–flocculation with clarification or dissolved air flotation (DAF).

  • Secondary (biological): activated sludge, MBBR, SBR, or MBR; anaerobic step for very high COD.

  • Tertiary: sand/dual-media filtration, activated carbon, advanced oxidation if refractory COD/color.

  • Disinfection: chlorination/hypochlorite or UV.

  • Sludge line: thickening, stabilization, dewatering, compliant disposal/reuse.

Key sizing rules of thumb

  • Equalization: HRT 6–12 h; mixer power 2–5 W/m3; pH control to 6.5–8.5.

  • Primary clarifier: surface overflow rate 20–40 m3/m2⋅d; weir loading 100–200 m3/m⋅d.

  • DAF: hydraulic loading 5–12 m3/m2⋅h; recycle ratio 10–30%; coagulant 50–300 mg/L(optimize by jar test).

  • Activated sludge: aeration HRT 6–10 h; MLSS 2,000–4,000 mg/L; F/M 0.2–0.5 d−1; SRT 8–20 d; DO >2 mg/L.

  • MBBR: carrier fill 40–60%; HRT 4–8 h; DO >2 mg/L.

  • MBR: flux 8–20 LMH; SRT >20 d; mixed liquor 8,000–12,000 mg/L.

  • Anaerobic (for high-strength): UASB OLR 6–12 kg COD/m3⋅d; HRT 6–12 h; biogas handling.

  • Filters: pressure sand filter 5–10 m/h; activated carbon EBCT 10–20 min.

  • Disinfection: UV dose 30–60 mJ/cm2 or chlorine C×t to meet microbial limits.

  • Nutrients for biology: BOD:N:P≈100:5:1; supplement if deficient.

Unit selection guidance

  • Oily/emulsified effluents: add API/plate oil separator and DAF before biology.

  • Toxic/recalcitrant streams (dyes, pharma): consider equalization, pH control, advanced oxidation pre/post biology, and MBR for polishing.

  • High COD > 4,000 mg/L: evaluate anaerobic first stage (UASB/EGSB/IC), then aerobic polishing.

  • Metals: precipitate with hydroxide/sulfide and clarify before biology to prevent inhibition.

  • Low TDS reuse: add softening/RO and manage RO reject safely.

Equipment and layout essentials

  • Provide isolation/bypass lines and drain sumps for every major unit.

  • Keep a gravity hydraulic profile; budget headloss across screens, DAF/clarifiers, filters, and UV.

  • Safe chemical storage with secondary containment; segregated acid/alkali; eyewash/showers.

  • Odor control with covers, ventilation, and biofilter/carbon where needed.

Instrumentation and control

  • Online: pH (headworks), DO (aeration), ORP (anoxic), turbidity/solids (effluent/filters), flow and level.

  • Control: PLC/SCADA, interlocks for low DO/high level, VFDs on blowers/pumps, automated chemical dosing tied to feedback.

  • Verification: routine lab BOD, COD, TSS, O&G, nutrients, metals, and microbiology.

Sludge line design

  • Thickening to 2–5% solids (gravity/DAF).

  • Stabilization: aerobic or anaerobic (mesophilic 15–25 d HRT).

  • Dewatering: belt press 15–25% cake, centrifuge 18–28%, plate press 30–45%.

  • Compliant end-use: compost/land application (if permitted), co-processing, incineration, or secure landfill.

Energy and chemical optimization

  • Right-size blowers; control by DO with VFDs (aeration is the main energy consumer).

  • Target fine-bubble diffusers in clean zones; plan for fouling and air-side filtration.

  • Use jar tests and polymer screens to minimize coagulant/polymer use and sludge production.

  • Recover biogas where anaerobic is used; consider solar for auxiliary loads.

Worked example: 100 m³/d ETP (typical light-industrial mix)

  • Assumptions: average flow Q=100 m3/d (4.17 m3/h); COD 1,500 mg/L, BOD 600 mg/L, TSS 300 mg/L, O&G 80 mg/L.

  • Equalization: HRT 8 h ⇒ volume V=Q×HRT=4.17×8≈33 m3; mixer ≈100 W.

  • Coag–floc + DAF: coagulant start at 100 mg/L (optimize); DAF area =4.17/8≈0.52 m2.

  • MBBR aeration: HRT 6 hV≈25 m3; carriers 50% fill; air to hold DO >2 mg/L.

  • Secondary clarifier: SOR 30 m3/m2⋅d ⇒ area =100/30≈3.3 m2.

  • Tertiary filters: PSF at 7 m/h ⇒ area =4.17/7≈0.6 m2; ACF EBCT 15 min ⇒ bed volume =4.17×0.25≈1.0 m3.

  • UV disinfection: dose 40 mJ/cm2 sized to filtered UVT.

  • Sludge: design for 0.6–0.8 kg dry solids per kg COD/BOD removed; select a small centrifuge or belt press accordingly.

Expected performance (well-operated)

  • TSS < 30 mg/L

  • BOD < 20 mg/L

  • COD < 100–150 mg/L (lower with carbon/AOP/MBR)

  • O&G < 10 mg/L

  • Pathogens to local limits after disinfection

If you share your influent data (flow, BOD/COD, TSS, O&G, nutrients, metals, pH) and your discharge or reuse targets, I can tailor a right-sized process train and unit capacities for your application.

Below is a ready-to-use comparison table of “our cost” vs “other cost” for a typical 100 KLD packaged ETP in India, anchored to publicly listed vendor prices and peer‑reviewed energy/O&M benchmarks for transparency and consistency. Values are illustrative and should be replaced with the actual proposal to reflect scope, civil works, automation level, and discharge/reuse targets for the specific site.

Cost comparison (100 KLD ETP)

MetricOur cost (illustrative)Other cost (market benchmark)
CAPEX (supply + install)₹16.5 lakh, set equal to a current public quote for a 100 KLD packaged ETP as an illustration placeholder₹20.5–25 lakh band from publicly listed 100 KLD packaged ETP offers (multiple vendors)
Energy use (process OPEX driver)0.3–0.5 kWh/m³ for optimized aerated biological treatment without advanced reuse, aligned with reported ranges for activated sludge plants0.5–0.8 kWh/m³ typical for conventional nutrient‑removal configurations; advanced reuse trains often reach 0.5–2.0 kWh/m³
Long‑term O&M sharePlan O&M as a substantial multi‑year budget alongside capex; sector advisories show large programs where 15‑year O&M is a major fraction of design‑build costs, underscoring life‑cycle budgeting needsPlants with membranes/tertiary reuse generally incur higher specific energy and O&M intensity than basic discharge‑only trains (0.5–2.0 kWh/m³ indicates elevated energy/O&M exposure)
 
 

Notes and assumptions

  • Scope placeholder: “Our cost” is shown as ₹16.5 lakh purely for formatting; it is pinned to a publicly listed 100 KLD ETP quote so the table can be used immediately and updated with the final offer number.

  • Benchmarking source: “Other cost” uses current vendor listings for 100 KLD packaged ETPs across India to provide a realistic public range for comparison that can be validated in procurement.

  • Operating cost context: Energy dominates biological OPEX; targeting the lower half of the 0.13–0.79 kWh/m³ envelope requires good aeration control and right‑sized blowers, while advanced reuse trains move total energy closer to 0.5–2.0 kWh/m³.

  • Customize per site: Civil works, automation, odor control, and siting constraints (e.g., compact/multi‑storey layouts) materially shift capex and O&M; national advisory material highlights how design choices alter construction and life‑cycle costs.

Bill of Materials & Equipment Specification Sheet for 100 KLD Industrial ETP

No.Equipment/MaterialDescription / SpecsQuantityNotes/Comments
1Bar ScreenMS/SS frame with automatic cleaning rake; 10–50 mm opening1Heavy-duty for primary screening
2Grit ChamberConcrete or MS structure with grit collection sump and scraper1Designed for velocity 0.15–0.30 m/s flow
3Oil-Water SeparatorAPI separator or plate pack type; capacity for 100 KLD flow1Corrosion-resistant finish
4Equalization TankRCC/MS tank; 33 m³ volume with mechanical agitator1Agitator: 3 kW, 1440 RPM
5pH Control SystemDosing pumps (acid/alkali), static mixer2 setsChemical dosing pump capacity ~10 L/h
6Flash MixerRapid mix tank with high-speed stirrer11–2 m³ volume
7Coagulation TankFlocculation tanks with slow-speed mechanical agitators23-5 m³ each; 0.15–0.3 kW mixers
8DAF UnitDissolved Air Flotation unit for solids/oil removal1Flow rate: 4.2 m³/hr; recycle pump included
9Aeration TankConcrete or MS fabricated; 25–40 m³; fine bubble diffuser aeration1Diffuser type: ceramic or membrane
10BlowerCapacity for DO ≥ 2 mg/L; 3–5 kW, VFD controlled1Noise insulation & air filter
11Secondary ClarifierCircular/Rectangular clarifier, 3–4 m² surface area1Sludge scraper included
12Pressure Sand FilterMS/FRP vessel; filtration rate 5–10 m/h; quartz sand media1Includes backwash system
13Activated Carbon FilterMS/FRP vessel; GAC media; EBCT ~15 min1For organics and residual color removal
14UV Disinfection UnitUV tube system designed for 5 m³/hr flow1Stainless steel chamber; UV dose ≥ 40 mJ/cm²
15Chemical Dosing PumpsMotorized, for coagulants, polymers, disinfectants3Capacity ~10–20 L/h; corrosion resistant
16Sludge ThickenerGravity thickener or DAF type; designed for sludge volume1Includes rake mechanism
17Dewatering EquipmentCentrifuge or belt press; capacity ~10–20 kg dry solids/day1Electrical control panel included
18PumpsETP process pumps: raw influent, sludge recycle, chemical feed5Various capacities; centrifugal types
19Instrumentation & SensorspH, DO, ORP, turbidity, flowmeters, level switchesSetOnline monitoring with PLC interface
20Control Panel & PLC/SCADAProgrammable logic controller with SCADA for automation and alarms1Room for expansion, remote monitoring
21Pipework & ValvesMS/HDPE/PVC pipes with ball valves, control valvesAs requiredIncludes flanges and supports
22Civil WorksRCC foundation, flooring, channeling, bund wallsAs per siteIncluded separately
23Ancillary ItemsElectrical cabling, lighting, pumps’ starters, vibration mountsAs requiredInstallation and commissioning service
 
 

Key Technical Specifications Summary

  • Flow Rate: 100 KLD (4.17 m³/hr)

  • Influent Characteristics: BOD 600 mg/L, COD 1500 mg/L, TSS 300 mg/L, Oil & Grease 80 mg/L

  • Design Conditions: pH 6.5–8.5, ambient temperature 15–45°C

  • Efficiency Targets: BOD < 20 mg/L, TSS < 30 mg/L, Oil & grease < 10 mg/L

  • Power Supply: 415 V, 3 Phase, 50 Hz, suitable DG backup provision

  • Materials: MS/SS as per corrosion resistance requirements; FRP for filter vessels

  • Automation: PLC with SCADA for online monitoring, alarms, automated dosing


This sheet can be customized with vendor-specific model numbers, certifications, and detailed technical submittals during procurement. It provides a strong foundation for cost estimation, tendering, and vendor comparison for turnkey or itemized ETP supply projects.

If needed, detailed piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), civil drawings, and operational manuals can be presented as separate documentation to accompany the procurement package.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

All Categories

Recent Posts

Hello world!

Effluent Treatment Plant

100 KLD STP Design

Smart City
Ease of Lving

Smart City

Quick booking process

Talk to an expert